Apple Case Study

Considering Apple Inc. CEO Steve Jobs’ salary of $1,[1] some may argue that his compensation ought to be a model for other executives. However, his modest cash compensation is more than offset by his past equity awards, including stock options that were backdated. The U.S. Attorney’s Office has opened a criminal investigation into the stock options backdating scandal at Apple.[2] Unfortunately for Apple shareholders, the company has been less than forthcoming about Jobs’ involvement in any improper backdating.



In June 2006, Apple announced that some of its past stock option grants were backdated, including options awarded to Jobs.[3] The company stated that it found no misconduct among its current management, though separately it announced the departure of one of its directors and former CFO Fred Anderson. Apple also admitted that Jobs was aware that “favorable grant dates had been selected,” but then emphasized that he did not benefit from them.[4]



Apple later noted there were two questionable grants to Jobs. One of them, dated Jan. 12, 2000, was not backdated, even though it received approval six days after it actually was granted.[5] Apple’s stock price on Jan. 12 happened to be its lowest level for a six-month period.[6]



Apple noted that the other grant, dated Oct. 19, 2001, was backdated. This grant was approved at a meeting that did not even take place, though no member of current management was aware of the “irregularity,” and resulted in a $20 million charge to the company.[7] Throughout this affair, Apple has continued to maintain that Jobs did not benefit from this backdated grant; however, a closer look suggests otherwise.



In January 2000, Jobs received a stock option mega-g ...
Word (s) : 773
Pages (s) : 4
View (s) : 1078
Rank : 0
   
Report this paper
Please login to view the full paper