Autocorrelation And Heteroscdascity

Autocorrelation: Serial Correlation Problem. CLRM assumption includes non-autocorrelation of errors. Ut and Us are not correlated
?Ã (Ut Us) = 0
In real life this assumption is not valid. The errors are serially correlated
Reason: 1) Business cycle- inertia most macroeconomic data
2) Cob-Web phenomenon: positive error to negative error etc.
3) Other data manipulation and misspecification: esp. missing variables.
Consequences:
1. Can still estimate OLS Parameters
2. OLS estimators are linear and unbiased
3. But OLS estimators are not the Best. LUE but not BLUE(best linear unbiased estimator)
4. Standard errors are high and biased
5. R2 is overestimated or inflated
6. t test, f tests are not reliable
7. The forecasts are unreliable

Diagnostic: time series data usually suffer from Auto correlation
Graphical Check (Step 1) Run OLS, find y¡¦s and then errors et = ut

Step 2) Then plot the errors

Durbin-Watson Test (DW)

Treatment (if positive or Negative Correlation)
Increase data sample, taking log or other transformations, generalized least squares (GLS)m Prais ¡V Wislen, Cochrave ¡V Orcult, Hildreth Lu, Durban two step.

Heteroscedasticity
Define: aka unequal variance. The variance of ui is no longer constant but varies from observation to observation. Occurs a lot in cross-sectional data. This is because we generally deal with members of a pop. at a given point in time. Also these members may be of different sizes, small, med, large, which results in a scale effect.
The variance of error changes across an observation. Especially in cross-section data. Scale effect ¡V changers according to individual. Ie. Bill Gates Money Lo ...
Word (s) : 560
Pages (s) : 3
View (s) : 1168
Rank : 0
   
Report this paper
Please login to view the full paper