Classical Philosophers Take On Knowledge

Sean
Philosophy 1102
SHU, Spring 2005

    

    The workings of the mind have been the focus of philosophers from the beginnings of humanity.  One primary focal point that has been pondered over by numerous thinkers is what exactly constitutes knowledge.  At first glance the issue seems to be cut and dry but the question gets more complicated with thought.  This can be witnessed by the many different epistemological theories put forward throughout the ages.  This can specifically be seen by looking at 4 different classical views on knowledge, those of Plato, Epicurus, the Stoics and the Skeptics.
    As it was stated in the opening paragraph of this essay everyone has their own theory of what constitutes knowledge. That is why I think it would be beneficial for me to state what I believe knowledge is.  First of all I don't think anyone can ever know anything for certain.  I believe that we can sense certain sights, smells, sounds, etc. but our senses could be mistaken.  We are let down by our senses all the time we see optical illusions, mirages, mishear people, confuse odors and the like.  Also if you think about all of the senses that we are lacking that other species have we are missing out on a great portion of reality.  For example bloodhounds have a drastically stronger sense of smell, snakes can see heat, dolphins and bats communicate through high frequency sounds that we can not dream of hearing.  Added to all the other things that go on around us daily that we are missing shows me that we are missing out on what is truly reality.  We can only hope to experience, or "know" our own very limited reality.  So to that end that is one reason ...
Word (s) : 1441
Pages (s) : 6
View (s) : 623
Rank : 0
   
Report this paper
Please login to view the full paper