Jetblue Porter Analysis

Competitive Analysis
Porter’s Verdict
The Porter framework shows that the airline industry is exceedingly unattractive.
Nevertheless, JetBlue has quickly attained profitability while maintaining its unusual low cost,
low-fare, and high-quality service strategy.
Rivalry is High
Consolidation notwithstanding, rivalry is high as numerous competitors remain in the
airline business. Major airlines such as Delta, United and American offer a substantially similar
flying experience to the customer, even though they try to differentiate by focusing on features
such as frequent flyer programs and legroom. Given their hub-and-spoke systems, these airlines
tend to fly to the same cities and tend to appeal to business travelers who have the least price
sensitivity. This commodity-like quality intensifies rivalry by engendering price-based
competition. Additionally, the industry is extremely sensitive to economic cycles. When the
economy contracts business travel declines, which is particularly adverse for airlines insofar as
corporate travelers display relatively price-inelastic demand. Their comparatively price-sensitive
counterparts, leisure travelers, also diminish booking flights when the economy slows.
Threat of New Entrants Is Low
As with most cyclical industries where rivalry is intense and profit margins are low and
unsustainable, the threat of new entrants is low. Obviously JetBlue is an exception as a company
that began service in February 2000, but it is pursuing a low-fare, point-to-point niche that is far
less crowded. Assuming a potential entrant can arrange financing, lease a fleet of safe and
reliable aircraft, negotiate reasonable gate access and landing fees, and survive high labor and
fuel costs, th ...
Word (s) : 375
Pages (s) : 2
View (s) : 690
Rank : 0
   
Report this paper
Please login to view the full paper