Within John Stuart Mill's "Utilitarianism and the 1868 Speech on Capital Punishment," much is said on topics of being happy/unhappy and decision making being just or unjust. Specifically, Mill tackles this idea in Chapter five, which deals with justice and utility. The first question Mill will toss around is about being just or unjust to give a superior remuneration based upon skill or talent. Mill states that he sees two sides of justice working. On a positive note, Mill states that society will gain from the laborer. If this man/woman does a good job then society owes him for his deeds. Basically, if a great job is done, then one shall receive a great pay for the great job. It would be ruled unfair in the workers mind in such that he/she receive the same pay for someone who has done less. So basically one shall be rewarded with ones labor. Mill also states the negative side to this question. This is whoever does a job in equal, whether that is his best or not shall be paid in equal. But this being said will not be the laborers fault for this. This lye in the superior who may be doing the remuneration. This then may come down to ones own personal belief whether or not they feel pay should go to the individual or shall lye within the community. This question is just a lead-in question to what Mill is getting to in the next paragraph. Mill will go on to talk about just and unjust of different methods within the tax system and ways of paying these taxes. The issue of taxes becomes a big argument in chapter five for Mill.
Mill states three possible ways taxes can be applied. The three are having the same amount for everyone to pay, or having the same percentage, or having hig ...