Opening
In an attempt to hire the best possible candidate and to properly analyze current workers, many companies have used some form of personality testing to attempt to better know their employees. Personality testing has shown the employers are desperately trying to fit the perfect person into the perfect position. Some of the "master chefs" of the selection business are paying special attention to the new chemistry between personality tests, competency requirements, and behavioural interviewing. But is the process of personality testing truly accurate? This paper will go into detail about how personality testing came to pass and how it evolved into the present environment. Furthermore, it will elaborate two major arguments as to why personality testing is not an adequate method of the hiring process and, mainly, how these arguments are addressed and dealt with by the creators of the tests.
The Beginning of Personality Testing
Although the origin of personality testing isn't exactly known, but the term "personality testing", when it comes to employment, is fairly specific. Fredrick Taylor's Principles of Scientific Management, published in 1911, popularized the notion that employee skills are quantifiable. Taylor's time-and-motion studies sought to determine seemingly precise aspects, for example, "How many times a minute should [a secretary] be able to open and close a file drawer?". This basic form of personality testing was very vague and the spurt of personality testing never really took off until 1919 when Henry C. Link's Employment Psychology stated:
The ideal employment method is undoubtedly an immense machine which would receive applicants of all kinds at one end, automatically sort, interview, a ...