Pleasure And Pain According To Samuel Guttenplan

Pleasure and pain are usually thought of as contrasting pairs.  They are opposites of each other because one is considered to be good and the other bad.  They are a pair because they represent two extremes on the same scale. Samuel Guttenplan speaks of pain as being an unpleasant sensation that is felt in a particular location within the body.  He makes no definition for pleasure, but he agrees that the two are compared to one another.  Nevertheless, in his classification, Guttenplan places pain and pleasure differently along the five dimensions of accessibility, observability, expressibility, directionality, and theoreticity he identifies.  I advocate that there should be no such differences in the classification of pleasure and pain.  They need to be placed in the exact same area on the map of the mind.
Guttenplan states that pleasure is an emotion because it is not as close to a bodily sensation as pain is.  By the same reasoning he classifies pain as an experience.  However, he does make it clear that he does not mean that pleasure can never describe bodily sensations or that pain is never a sorrowful emotion.  His placement decision comes from the idea that pain is normally considered to be a sensation, and pleasure is normally thought of in terms of emotions.  I feel that the difference depends only on whether or not pain and pleasure are mental or physical.  For instance, mental pain or pleasure are emotional because they happen in the mind usually with due cause from an external force.  They are easily considered emotions because they deal with feelings.  Likewise, physical pain and pleasures are bodily sensations because they happen to the outside of the body.  These sensations are also d ...
Word (s) : 1310
Pages (s) : 6
View (s) : 475
Rank : 0
   
Report this paper
Please login to view the full paper